A few extra kilometres a week
A sales rep with a 1,400cc car adds 40 km a week to genuine claims for 45 weeks. Every kilometre falls in Band 2. The extra 1,800 km is not a reimbursement of a cost, so it can't be paid tax-free.
The patterns that turn up on Irish travel and subsistence claims, the rule each one breaks, and what follows for tax, employment and criminal law. With a checker for a single claim.
Checked on 11 October 2026 against Revenue's Tax and Duty Manuals 05-01-06 and 38-03-33 (both reviewed September 2026), the Code of Practice for Revenue Compliance Interventions, the Theft and Fraud Offences Act 2001 and published WRC decisions. This guide covers travel and subsistence only, not corporate cards, purchasing or invoice fraud.
Travel and subsistence fraud is knowingly claiming mileage or an allowance that wasn't incurred or isn't due: extra kilometres, trips that didn't happen, a day or night rate that fails the time or distance tests, or one cost claimed twice. A payment that doesn't meet Revenue's conditions isn't a tax-free reimbursement; it is pay, taxable through payroll.[1] Deliberate false claims can also be a criminal offence[6] and grounds for dismissal, after a fair procedure.[7] Many wrong claims are honest mistakes, so check first and ask before you accuse.
Shortest practicable route; the lesser of home or base when a trip starts at home.
5 or 10 hours away and more than 8 km for a day rate; more than 100 km for a night.
No flat rate on top of a receipt for the same meal, no two claims for one car.
PAYE, PRSI and USC are due, with interest and possibly a penalty.
Put the facts to the employee and hear the answer before deciding anything.
The difference is intent. Revenue's penalty rules and the criminal law both turn on it.
Not deliberate and not a failure to take reasonable care. Revenue lets these be corrected without a penalty; statutory interest still applies.[5]
A "failure to take reasonable care". Think of day rates paid for years without anyone recording the times. Penalties start at 3% of the tax with an unprompted disclosure.[5]
Needs indicators of intent, such as "providing incomplete, false or misleading documents or information". Penalties up to 100% of the tax, and possible prosecution.[5]
The criminal law draws the same line. The theft and fraud offences all require that a person acted dishonestly, which the 2001 Act defines as "without a claim of right made in good faith".[6] An employee who honestly believed a journey counted, even wrongly, isn't acting dishonestly.
The civil service rules set the tone: the subsistence allowance "is not intended to be a source of emolument or profit".[2] The aim of a claims process is to pay what was genuinely incurred, not to catch people out.
Eleven patterns, the rule each one breaks and the check that finds it. Every one of them can also be an honest mistake.
The tests behind these flags are explained in the 10-hour day rate guide, the overnight subsistence rates, normal place of work, how to calculate mileage and EV mileage rates.
Enter one trip as it was claimed: where it started, the times, how far the place visited is from base and from home, and what was claimed. The checker lists each rule the claim breaks and where the rule comes from.
Enter one trip as claimed, or start from a common problem.
One-way road distance to the place visited. Enter 0 for the normal place of work if it is the place visited.
Nothing on this claim breaks the distance, time or duplicate rules. Keep the record (date, reason, kilometres, start and end points, times) for six years.[1]
A red flag means the claim can't be paid tax-free as entered. It doesn't mean anyone was dishonest: many come from a wrong start point, a rounded distance or a misunderstood rule. Ask first.
Three public bodies, three internal audits. Mostly errors and weak controls, and one practice that turned taxable pay into tax-free allowances.
None of these audits was a finding of fraud against an individual. In the Garda case, the force said that because local management had agreed the practice, internal discipline did not arise for anyone who claimed that way.[13] The lesson is the same in all three: controls that aren't tested stop working, and an allowance used in place of pay creates a tax problem whoever approved it.
A payment that doesn't meet Revenue's conditions isn't a tax-free reimbursement. It is pay, and the tax on it is due with interest.
Revenue disregards travel and subsistence payments only where the employee was temporarily away from the normal place of work, the travel was necessarily incurred in doing the job, and the subsistence relates to that travel.[1] A flat rate up to the civil service rates needs no Revenue approval, but only "where a satisfactory recording and internal control system is in operation".[1]
Anything outside those conditions is taxable and subject to PAYE: commuting mileage, and round sums paid "irrespective of expenses actually incurred".[1] And where pay is labelled as tax-free expenses, Revenue says it will consider whether there is any element of fraud or neglect, or whether a Revenue offence may have been committed.[1]
Since 1 January 2024, employers report each tax-free travel and subsistence payment to Revenue on or before paying it: the amount, the date and the subcategory, such as travel unvouched or subsistence unvouched.[4] Revenue's manual says the employer must decide in advance of each payment whether the conditions for paying it tax-free are met.[4] See the ERR compliance guide.
A sales rep with a 1,400cc car adds 40 km a week to genuine claims for 45 weeks. Every kilometre falls in Band 2. The extra 1,800 km is not a reimbursement of a cost, so it can't be paid tax-free.
For a first qualifying disclosure, by behaviour and timing. Statutory interest is charged on top and can't be reduced.[5]
It can be, where it is dishonest and made to gain money. Two offences in the 2001 Act fit a false travel claim.
Dishonestly, by any deception, inducing another to do an act, with the intention of making a gain or causing a loss. Up to 5 years on indictment, a fine, or both.[6]
Dishonestly falsifying any account or document "made or required for any accounting purpose", including making an entry that is false or misleading in a material particular. Up to 10 years on indictment, a fine, or both.[6]
A claim form or mileage log can be a document made or required for an accounting purpose, so a deliberately false entry on one can fall within section 10. Both offences need dishonesty and an intention to make a gain or cause a loss.[6]
On the tax side, Revenue's Code of Practice says that where serious evasion or fraud is found in any intervention, Revenue will open an investigation with a view to prosecution.[5]
Deliberate dishonesty can justify dismissal. A dismissal without fair procedures usually fails, however strong the evidence looks.
The allegation and the evidence, in writing where needed.
There may be an answer: a detour, a different start point, a policy nobody explained.
A colleague or a registered trade union.
Taking account of everything they said and all the relevant evidence.
A clear range of penalties and a route to challenge the outcome.
These are the principles of natural justice and fair procedures in the statutory Code of Practice on Grievance and Disciplinary Procedures.[7]
A shop employee was paid a monthly mileage allowance for working at a branch. During the 2020 lockdown, with that shop closed all month, he claimed half his usual mileage; he said the "mileage" had really been a wage increase. He was dismissed by email the following week. The adjudicator found "no procedures followed at all" (no disciplinary interview, no representation, no appeal) and awarded four weeks' pay, €2,258.76, plus notice pay.[8]
An accountant was dismissed after an inquiry into the accounts, which included about €65,700 paid to him over seven years that the employer said "there was no way" was mileage; he said it included agreed commission put through as mileage. The Tribunal found the initial investigation "not as independent as it should have been", held the dismissal unfair, found he had contributed to it, and awarded €35,000.[9]
Checks that run on every claim, before it is paid, plus a sample checked properly after.
ERR assumes the employer has decided each payment qualifies before it is made.
Compare claimed kilometres with a mapped route from the recorded start point.
Departure and return times decide the 5h, 10h and 29-hour tests.
Same date and place twice, flat rate plus receipt, two claims for one car.
Each person's normal place of work, home distance band and vehicle engine size.
Name, date, reason, km, start, destination, finish and basis for each trip.
A dip sample against diaries, logbooks and leave records, done regularly.
Log each overpayment until it is repaid or corrected through payroll.
Revenue's records list is the backbone: the employee's name and address, the date, the reason for the journey, the kilometres, the starting point, destination and finishing point, and the basis for the payment, kept for six years after the end of the tax year.[1] A claim that records all of that is also a claim that can be checked.
The Garda College problem surfaced through an anonymous complaint, a dip sample and then the vehicle logbooks.[13] The HSE auditors' main recommendations were wider second-line checking and a formal process for tracking and escalating overpayment recoveries.[12]
Establish the facts, hear the employee, then deal with the money and the tax separately from any discipline.
Secure the claims, the approvals and any logs. Compare them with the route, the times, the diary and leave records. Check whether the policy was clear and how others were treated.
Put the specific claims to the employee and let them explain, with representation if it becomes disciplinary. Keep the investigation independent of anyone involved in the claims.[7][9]
Agree repayment of what was overpaid. Where tax-free payments didn't qualify, correct payroll and your ERR reporting for the periods affected.[1][4]
Self-correction without penalty is available within time limits (for PAYE, broadly before the income or corporation tax return date for the period). After that, an unprompted qualifying disclosure carries the lowest penalties.[5]
A worker who reasonably believes information shows an offence, a failure to comply with a legal obligation, or an "unlawful or otherwise improper use of funds or resources of a public body, or of other public money" can make a protected disclosure and is protected from penalisation for it.[10] Employers with 50 or more employees, and every public body regardless of size, must operate internal reporting channels.[10]
One limit: a matter isn't a relevant wrongdoing if it is the worker's own job, or the employer's function, to detect or investigate it, unless it involves an act or omission by the employer.[10]
Revenue, the civil service circulars, Irish legislation, published WRC and EAT decisions, and reporting on Irish public-sector audits.
Checked against these sources on 11 October 2026. This is general information, not legal or tax advice. Whether a claim is dishonest, and what to do about it, depends on the facts; take advice on your own situation.
Expense.ie works out kilometres from the mapped route, applies the time and distance tests to each allowance, warns about likely duplicates, keeps the trip records Revenue asks for, and builds the ERR file.
Team plan from €29/month. Card required, nothing charged until day 7.